ОКВИР КЊИЖЕВНОГ ТЕКСТА: ОД МОРФОЛОШКОГ ПРИСТУПА ДО КОГНИТИВНОГ МЕТАКОНЦЕПТА
Keywords:
Key words: frame, framing, cognitive meta-concept, transmedialityAbstract
The phenomenon of framing and borders of a literary work has from the very beginning of the development of modern literary theory captured the attention of theoreticians. In structuralism, frames are considered as a privileged morphological segment of the text considering that it appears on its outter edges. Jurij Lotman speaks about the structurally strong position of frames, and in classical narratology the study on paratext by Gerard Genette will be greatly influential. With the development of cognitive orientation in post-classical narratology, the frame becomes one of the primary research topics, both in meta-theoretical and interpretative terms. In the introduction section of the journal Framing Borders in Literature and Other Media (2006), Werner Wolf starts from the linguistic insight of Charles Fillmore, and defnes the frame of artifacts as a cognitive meta-concept, or more precisely, a cultural contruct that possesses certain historical and cultural flexibility. The focus of his approach is “framing” as the process of coding of cognitive frames. The priviledged status of this theoretical term, Wolf puts forward along with the thesis of the frame as a transmedial phenomenon, whereas the confrmation of his thesis is found in the interdisciplinary nature of the journal. Despite a number of new insight, the frame of fctionality still stands as a challenge, as well as the problem of meta-framed conceptualization.
Downloads
References
Anderson, Joseph D. (1996). The Reality of Illusion: An Ecological Approach to Cognitive Film Theory. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Univ. Press.
Bal, Mieke (1980/1985). Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Transl. Christine van Boheemen. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.
Barricelli, Jean-Pierre, Joseph Gibaldi, eds. (1982). Interrelations of Literature. New York, NY: MLA.
Bateson, Gregory (1955/1972). “A Theory of Play and Fantasy”. Gregory
Bateson. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York, NY: Ballantine. 177‒193.
Brüderlin, Markus (1995). “Der Rahmen will Bild werden: Das Rah-men (Kunst)Werk des 20. Jahrhunderts”. Mendgen, ed.: supple-ment 17‒29.
Bruster, Douglas, Robert Weimann (2004). Prologues to Shake-speare’s Theatre: Performance and Liminality in Early Modern Drama. London: Routledge.
Caws, Mary Ann (1985). Reading Frames in Modern Fiction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Crystal, David (1987/1997). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: CUP. Second ed.
Culler, Jonathan (1988). Framing the Sign: Criticism and its Institu-tions. Norman, OK/London: Univ. of Oklahoma Press.
Derrida, Jacques (1978/1987). La Vérité en peinture. Paris: Flam-marion. Truth in Painting. Transl. Geoff Bennington. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Drew, Paul, Anthony Wootton, eds. (1987). Erving Goffman: Explor-ing the Interactional Order. Oxford: Polity Press.
Eco, Umberto (1977/1981). The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. London: Hutchinson.
Fillmore, Charles J. (1976). “Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language”. Stevan R. Harnad, Horst Dieter Steklis, J. Lancaster, eds. Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech. Annals of the New York Association of Sciences 280. New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences. 20‒32.
Fishman Summerfeld, Judith (1986). “Framing Narratives”. Thomas Newkirk, ed. Only Connect: Uniting Reading and Writing. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton. 227‒240.
Fludernik, Monika (1993). The Fictions of Language and the Lan-guages of Fiction: The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London: Routledge.
Frow, John (1982). “The Literary Frame”. Journal of Aesthetic Edu-cation18/2: 25‒30.
Furbank, Philip Nicholas (1970). Reflections on the Word ‘Image’. London: Secker and Warburg.
Genette, Gérard (1987). Seuils. Collection ‘Poétique’. Paris: Seuil.
Gibson, Andrew (1996). Towards a Postmodern Theory of Narrative. Postmodern Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press.
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organiza-tion of Experience. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard Univ. Press.
Hamon, Philippe (1977). “Texte littéraire et métalangage”. Poétique 8/31: 261‒284.
Hawthorn, Jeremy (1994). A Concise Glossary of Contemporary Literary Theory. London: Edward Arnold. Second ed.
Helbig, Jörg, ed. (1998). Intermedialität: Theorie und Praxis eines interdisziplinären Forschungsgebiets. Berlin: Schmidt.
Hornby, Richard (1986). Drama, Metadrama, and Perception. Lon-don: Associated Univ. Presses.
Hrushovsky, Benjamin (1984). “Poetic Metaphor and Frames of Reference”. Poetics Today5: 5‒43.
Iser, Wolfgang (1975). “Die Wirklichkeit der Fiktion: Elemente eines funktionsgeschichtlichen Textmodells”. Rainer Warning, ed. Rezeptionsästhetik: Theorie und Praxis. Munich: Fink. 277‒324.
Jakobson, Roman (1960). “Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics”. Thomas A. Sebeok, ed. Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press. 350‒377.
Lagerroth, Ulla-Britta, Hans Lund,Erik Hedling, eds. (1997). Interart Poetics: Essays on the Interrelations of the Arts and Media. Inter-nationale Forschungen zur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Lite-raturwissenschaft 24. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Lanser, Susan Sniader (1981). The Narrative Act: Point of View in Prose Fiction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Larroux, Guy (1994). “Mise en cadre et clausularité”. Poétique25: 247‒253.
Lotman, Jurij (1970/1977). The Structure of the Artistic Text. Michi-gan Slavic Contributions. Transl. Gail Lenhoff, Ronald Vroon. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press.
MacLachlan, Gale, Ian Reid (1994). Framing and Interpretation. Interpretations. Melbourne: Melbourne Univ. Press.
McHale, Brian (1987). Postmodernist Fiction. London: Routledge.
Maquerlot, Jean-Pierre (1992). “Playing Within the Play: Towards a Semiotics of Metadrama and Metatheatre”. François Laroque, ed. The Show Within: Dramatic and Other Insets: English Renais-sance Drama (1550-1642).
Proceedings of the International Con-ference Held in Montpellier, 22-25 November, 1990. Montpellier: Univ. Paul-Valéry-Montpellier III. 39‒49.
Mendgen, Eva, ed. (1995). In Perfect Harmony: Bild und Rahmen 1850-1920. Amsterdam: Van Gogh Museum/Vienna: Kunstforum Wien.
Minsky, Marvin (1975). “A Framework for Representing Knowl-edge”. Patrick H. Winston, ed. The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. 211‒277.
Müller, Klaus (1984). Rahmenanalyse des Dialogs: Aspekte des Sprachverstehens in Alltagssituationen. Tübinger Beiträge zur Lin-guistik
Tübingen: Narr.
Müske, Eberhard (1992). Diskurssemiotik: Zur funktionellen Integra-tion des Frame-Konzepts in ein dynamisches Modell literarisch-künstlerischer Texte. Stuttgarter Arbeiten zur Germanistik 264.
Stuttgart: Heinz. Nelles, William (1997). Frameworks: Narrative Levels and Embedded Narrative. American University Studies 19: General Literature 33. New York, NY: Lang.
Nünning, Ansgar, ed. (1997/2004). Metzler Lexikon Literatur- und Kulturtheorie. Third ed. Stuttgart: Metzler.
Pearce, Richard (1975). “Enter the Frame”. Raymond Federman, ed. Surfction: Fiction Now ... and Tomorrow. Chicago, IL: Swallow Press. 47‒57.
Pearse, James A. (1980). “Beyond the Narrational Frame: Interpreta-tion and Metafction”. The Quarterly Journal of Speech66: 73‒84.
Pearson, John H. (1990). “The Politics of Framing in the Late Nine-teenth Century”. Mosaic23: 15‒30.
Prince, Gerald (1987). A Dictionary of Narratology. Aldershot: Scolar Press.
Rajewsky, Irina O. (2002). Intermedialität. UTB 2261. Tübingen: Francke.
Reid, Ian (1992). Narrative Exchanges. London: Routledge.
Ricardou, Jean (1978). Le Nouveau roman. Ecrivains de toujours. Paris: Seuil.
Rumelhart, David E. (1980). “Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition”. Rand J. Spiro, Bertram C. Bruce, William F. Brewer, eds. Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artifcial Intelligence, and Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schmeling, Manfred (1977). Das Spiel im Spiel: Ein Beitrag zur ver-gleichenden Literaturkritik. Deutsche und vergleichende Litera-turwissenschaft 3.
Rheinfelden: Schäuble. — (1982). Métathéâtre et intertexte: Aspects du théâtre dans le théâ-tre. Archives de lettres modernes204. Paris: Lettres Modernes.
Schwanitz, Dietrich (1990). Systemtheorie und Literatur: Ein neues Paradigma. WV Studium 157. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Schweikle, Günther, Irmgard Schweikle, eds. (1990). Metzler Litera-turlexikon: Begriffe und
Defnitionen. Stuttgart: Metzler. Second ed.
Seager, Dennis L. (1991). Stories Within Stories: An Ecosystemic Theory of Metadiegetic Narrative. New York, NY: Lang.
Semino, Elena (1997). Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. Textual Explorations. London: Longman.
Shakespeare, William (1997). The Norton Shakespeare. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt. New York, NY: Norton.
Shryock, Richard (1993). Tales of Storytelling: Embedded Narrative in Modern French Fiction. American University Studies 2: Ro-mance Languages and Literatures 206. New York, NY: Lang.
Simmel, Georg (1902/1922). “Der Bildrahmen”. Georg Simmel. Zur Philosophie der Kunst: Philosophische und kunstphilosophische Aufsätze. Ed. Gertrud Simmel. Potsdam: Kiepenhauer. 46‒54.
Stoichita, Victor I. (1993/1998). L’Instauration du tableau. Paris: Klincksieck. Das selbstbewußte Bild: Vom Ursprung der Meta-malerei. Bild und Text. Transl. Heinz Jatho. Munich: Finck.
Stratmann, Gerrit (2000). Rahmenerzählungen der Moderne: Situation und Gestaltung einer Erzählform zwischen 1893 und 1928. Mar-burg: Tectum.
Tannen, Deborah, ed. (1993). Framing in Discourse. New York: OUP.
— (1993a). “Introduction”. Tannen, ed.: 3‒13.
— (1993b). “What’s in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying Expectation”. Tannen, ed.: 14-56.
Traber, Christine (1995). “In Perfect Harmony? Entgrenzungen in der Kunst des frühen 20. Jahrhunderts”. Mendgen, ed.: 221‒248.
Träger, Claus, ed. (1986). Wörterbuch der Literaturwissenschaft. Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut.
Vieweg-Marks, Karin (1989). Metadrama und englisches Gegen-wartsdrama. Literarische Studien 1. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Voigt, Joachim (1954). Das Spiel im Spiel: Versuch einer Formbe-stimmung an Beispielen aus dem deutschen, englischen und spani-schen Drama. PhD Dissertation, Univ. of Göttingen.
Warning, Rainer (1983). “Der inszenierte Diskurs: Bemerkungen zur pragmatischen Relation der Fiktion”. Dieter Henrich, Wolfgang Iser,
eds. Funktionen des Fiktiven. Poetik und Hermeneutik 10. Munich: Fink. 83‒206.
Waugh, Patricia (1984). Metafction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction. New Accents. London: Methuen.
Weinrich, Harald (1971). “Kommunikative Literaturwissenschaft”. Harald Weinrich. Literatur für Leser: Essays und Aufsätze zur
Literaturwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. 1-7.
Williams, Jeffrey (1998). Theory and the Novel: Narrative Reflexivity in the British Tradition. Cambridge: CUP.
Wilpert, Gero von (1969). Sachwörterbuch der Literatur. Stuttgart: Kröner. Fifth ed.
Winograd, Terry (1974). “A Framework for Understanding Dis-course”. Marcel Adam Just, Patricia A. Carpenter, eds. Cognitive Processes in Comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. 63‒88.
Wolf, Werner (1999a). “Framing Fiction. Reflections on a Narrato-logical Concept and an Example: Bradbury, Mensonge”. Walter Grünzweig, Andreas Solbach, eds. Grenzüberschreitungen: Narra-tologie im Kontext/
Transcending Boundaries: Narratology in Con-text. Tübingen: Narr. 97‒124.
— (1999b). The Musicalization of Fiction: A Study in the Theory and History of Intermediality. Internationale Forschungen zur allgemei-nen und vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft 35. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
— (2001). “Formen literarischer Selbstreferenz in der Erzählkunst: Versuch einer Typologie und ein Exkurs zur ‘mise en cadre’ und ‘mise en reflet/série’”. Jörg Helbig, ed. Erzählen und Erzähltheorie im zwanzigsten
Jahrhundert: Festschrift für Wilhelm Füger. Hei-delberg: Winter. 49‒84.
— (2002). “Intermediality Revisited: Reflections on Word and Music Relations in the Context of a General Typology of Intermediality”. Suzanne M. Lodato, Suzanne Aspden, Walter Bernhart, eds. Word and Music Studies: Essays in Honor of Steven Paul Scher and on Cultural Identity and the Musical Stage. Word and Music Studies 4. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 13‒34.
— (2005). “Rahmenerzählung”. Gert Ueding, ed. Historisches Wör-terbuch der Rhetorik7. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 560‒566.
— (forthcoming). “Der Prolog als traditionelle Form dramatischer Anfangsrahmung: Probleme der Defnition und der Funktions-geschichte im englischen Drama des 19. Jahrhunderts”. Doris 40 Werner WolfMader, Maria Löschnigg, Hugo Keiper, eds. Metamorphosen: Eng-lische Literatur und die Tradition. Anglistische Forschungen. Heidelberg: Winter.
Young, Katharine (2004). “Frame and Boundary in the Phenomenol-ogy of Narrative”. Marie-Laure Ryan, ed. Narrative Across Media: The Languages of Storytelling. Lincoln, NE: Univ. of Nebraska Press. 76‒107.
Zaloscer, Hilde (1974). “Versuch einer Phänomenologie des Rah-mens”.
Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft19: 189‒224.
Zander, Horst (1996). “‘Non enim adjectio haec ejus, sed opus ipsum est’: Überlegungen zum Paratext in Tristram Shandy”. Poetica28: 132‒153.
Zima, Peter V., ed. (1995). Literatur intermedial: Musik – Malerei – Photographie – Film. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesell-schaft.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
