PRESERVING ONE’S HUMANITY IN CHALLENGING TIMES: THE VARIOUS FORMS OF RESISTANCE IN GEORGE ORWELL’S 1984

Authors

  • Anja Petrović

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46630/phm.14.2022.10

Keywords:

George Orwell, Lionel Trilling, Martha Nussbaum, totalitarianism, resistance

Abstract

This paper will aim to analyze George Orwell’s novel Nineteen-Eighty-Four (1949) in order to uncover the ways in which the characters in the novel resist the influence of an oppressive totalitarian regime and preserve their humanity, that is, the instincts and impulses which characterize a human subject. The modernist point of view will be chosen as the theoretical framework for analysis, due to the fact that modernist literature focuses on the subjective outlook of a character and foregrounds the complex mental processes occurring in his psyche. The concepts evoked in Lionel Trilling’s essay, “Freud: Within and Beyond Culture” (1968), will be referred to when describing the means of resistance that are available to a human subject. Special emphasis will be placed on Freud’s idea of biological resistance which is grounded in a person’s physiology, and on the argument that exposure to different cultures allows an individual to oppose negative cultural influences. Additionally, the view that sexual liberty defies political authority, as is proposed in Martha Nussbaum’s essay “The Transfiguration of Everyday Life: Joyce” (2001), will be taken as an example of how erotic love can also function as a means of opposing the dominant regime.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BLOOM 2007: Bloom, Harold, ed. Bloom’s Modern Critical Views: George Orwell- Updated Edition. New York: Infobase Publishing, 2007.

ELLMANN 2010: Ellmann, Maud. The Nets of Modernism: Henry James, Virginia Woolf, James Joyce, and Sigmund Freud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

GASIOREK 2015: Gasiorek, Andrzej. A History of Modernist Literature. Vol. 7. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2015

JACOBS 2007: Jacobs, Naomi. “Dissent, Assent, and the Body in Nineteen Eighty-Four.” Utopian Studies 18, no. 1 (2007): 3–20. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20719844.

MEYERS 2005: Mayers, Jeffrey. “George Orwell and the Art of Writing.” The Kenyon Review 27, no. 4 (2005): 92–114. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4338803.

NUSSBAUM 2001: Nussbaum, Martha. “The Transfiguration of Everyday Life: Joyce.” Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions, ed. Martha Nussbaum, 679-710. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

ORWELL 1949: Orwell, George. Nineteen Eighty-Four. United Kingdom: Martin Secker and Warburg, 1949.

PATKE 2013: Patke, Rajeev S. Modernist literature and postcolonial studies. Edinburgh University Press, 2013.

POTTER 2012: Potter, Rachel. Modernist Literature: Edinburgh Critical Guides. Edinburgh University Press. 2012.

QUINONES 2014: Quinones, R. J. Mapping Literary Modernism (Vol. 21). Princeton University Press, 2014.

SHERRY 1987: Sherry, Vincent. “George Orwell and T. S. Eliot: The Sense of the Past.” College Literature 14, no. 2 (1987): 85–100. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25111729.

STEVENSON 1992: Stevenson, Randall. “Space.” Modernist Fiction: An Introduction, ed. Randall Stevenson, 17-82. University Press of Kentucky, 1992.

TRILLING 1968: Trilling, Lionel. “Freud: Within and Beyond Culture.” Beyond Culture: Essay on Literature and Learning, edited by Lionel Trilling, 89-118. New York: The Viking Press.

WANNER 2007: Wanner, Adrian."The underground man as Big Brother: Dostoevsky's and Orwell's anti-utopia." Bloom’s Modern Critical Views: George Orwell – Updated Edition. Edited by Harold Bloom. Infobase Publishing, 2007.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-10

Issue

Section

СТУДИЈЕ И ОГЛЕДИ / STUDIES AND ESSAYS