AUTHORIAL PRESENCE IN SERBIAN AND ENGLISH CO-AUTHORED SOCIAL SCIENCE ARTICLES

Authors

  • Aleksandar Pejčić

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46630/phm.14.2022.28

Keywords:

authorial presence, social science, Serbian, English, discourse analysis

Abstract

This paper examines the means by which authors’ presence in co-authored articles is signaled directly in Serbian and international research articles belonging to social sciences and written in English by Serbian and native English speakers respectively. By comparing 15 Serbian and 11 international articles, the study tested the hypothesis that Serbian authors avoid the use of first-person pronouns in order to demonstrate authorial modesty, compared to English-speaking authors, whose direct usage of the first-person plural was expected to occur regularly. Additional research questions asked were about the discourse functions performed by first-person plural pronouns referring to the co-authors of the texts, as well as the use of the inclusive/exclusive we by the two examined groups. The results showed that Anglo-American authors use considerably more first-person pronouns in their research articles, although their placement in separate article sections had a similar pattern in both groups. According to Dontcheva-Navratilova’s (2013) taxonomy, the two dominant discourse functions performed by the authorial we were those of the recounter of the research process and the opinion-holder, although with their order switched between the groups. Finally, neither group used the inclusive we to a great extent, except for the Intro+Lit section of the papers, where its inclusion in the text grew up to 52.5% in the Sr group, but only 23% in the AnAm group. These results suggest that cultural practices in establishing authorial presence between Serbian and Anglo-American writers may be closer than previously thought.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BIBER ET AL. 1999: BIBER, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad and E. Finegan. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, Harlow: Pearson, 1999.

BLAGOJEVIĆ 2008: BLAGOJEVIĆ, Savka. Metadiskurs u akademskom diskursu. Niš: Filozofski fakultet, 2008.

BLAGOJEVIĆ 2010: BLAGOJEVIĆ, Savka. “The Manifestation of Authorial Presence in Academic Writing as a Sign of Cultural Identity.” In: Lopičić, V. & B. Mišić Ilić, ur. (2010), Identity Issues: Literary and Linguistic Landscapes. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 251–265.

BLAGOJEVIĆ 2011: BLAGOJEVIĆ, Savka. “’Mi’ kao ’mi’ ili ’mi’ kao ’ja: prvo lice množine kao eksponent autorovog prisustva u akademskom pisanom diskursu.” Zbornik Matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku, vol. 54, issue 2 (2011): 207−218.

BLAGOJEVIĆ 2012: BLAGOJEVIĆ, Savka. O engleskom i srpskom akademskom diskursu. Niš: Biblioteka Studije – Filozofski fakultet, 2012.

BREIVEGA ET AL. 2002: BREIVEGA, K. R., DAHL, T. & FLOTTUM, K. “Traces of Self and Others in Research Articles: A Comparative Pilot Study of English, French and Norwegian.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 12, issue 2 (2002): 218–241.

ÇANDARLI ET AL 2015: ÇANDARLI, D., BAYYURT, Y. & MARTI, L. “Authorial presence in L1 and L2 novice academic writing: Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 20 (2015): 192-202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.10.001 Search in Google Scholar

CHAVEZ MUNOZ 2013: CHAVEZ MUNOZ, M. “The “I” in interaction: authorial presence in academic writing.” Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, vol. 8, issue 1 (2013): 49-58. doi: https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2013.1162

CRISMORE ET AL 1993: CRISMORE, A., MARKKANEN, R., & STEFFENSEN, M “Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students.” Written Communication, vol. 10, issue 1 (1993): 39-71.

ČMEJRKOVA 1996: ČMEJRKOVA, S. “Academic Writing in Czech and English.” In: Ventola, E. & A. Mauranen, eds. (1996), Academic Writing: Introduction and Textual Issues. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 137– 145.

ČMEJRKOVA 2007: ČMEJRKOVA, S, “The representation of the author in Czech and Slovak scientific texts.” Jezik in slovstvo, vol. II, 3-4 (2007): 95−105.

DONTCHEVA-NAVRATILOVA 2013: DONTCHEVA-NAVRATILOVA, Olga. “Authorial presence in academic discourse: Functions of author-reference pronouns.” Linguistica Pragensia, vol. 23, issue 1 (2013): 9-30.

DUSZAK 1998: DUSZAK, A. “Academic writing in English and Polish: comparing and subverting genres.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 8 (1998): 191-213.

ĐORĐEVIĆ & VESIĆ PAVLOVIĆ 2020: ĐORĐEVIĆ, D. & VESIĆ PAVLOVIĆ, T. Metadiskursni markeri u kontekstu sažetaka naučnih radova iz poljoprivredne tehnike. In: V. Lopičić, B. Mišić, eds. (2020), Jezik, književnost, kontekst. Niš: Filozofski fakultet, 303–317.

FLOTTUM ET AL 2006: FLOTTUM, Kjersti, et al. Academic Voices across Languages and Disciplines. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2006.

FLOTTUM ET AL 2007: FLOTTUM, Kjersti et al. “Cultural Identities and Academic Voices.” In: Kjersti Fløttum, ed. (2007), Language and Discipline Perspectives on Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 14–39.

HARWOOD 2005: HARWOOD, N. “‘We do not seem to have a theory… The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 26 (2005): 343–375.

HINDS 1987: HINDS, John. “Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology.” In: Connor, U. & R. B. Kaplan, eds. (1987), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 Text. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 141-152.

HYLAND 1998: HYLAND, Ken. “Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 30 (1998): 437-455.

HYLAND 2001: HYLAND, Ken. “Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles.” English for Specific Purposes, vol. 20 (2001): 207-226.

HYLAND 2002: HYLAND, Ken. “Directives: Argument and Engagement in Academic Writing.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 23, issue 2 (2002): 215–39.

HYLAND 2002a: HYLAND, Ken. “Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 34 (2002): 1091–1112.

HYLAND 2002b: HYLAND, Ken. “Options of identity in academic writing.” English Language Teaching Journal, vol. 56, issue 4 (2002): 351–358.

HYLAND 2004: HYLAND, Ken. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2004.

HYLAND 2005: HYLAND, Ken. Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing. London and New York: Continuum, 2005.

ISIK-TAS, E. E. 2018: ISIK-TAS, E. E. “Authorial identity in Turkish language and English language research articles in Sociology: The role of publication context in academic writers' discourse choices.” English for Specific Purposes, vol. 49 (2018): 26-38.

IVANIČ 1998: IVANIČ, Roz. Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins, 1998.

JANUARTO & HARDJANTO 2020: JANUARTO, Adelia & HARDJANTO, Tofan. “Authorial Presence in English Research Articles by Native and Non-Native English Scholars.” Language and Language Teaching Journal, vol. 23 (2020): 241-254. doi: 10.24071/llt.2020.230204.

KUO 1999: KUO, C. H., “The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles.” English for Specific Purposes, vol. 18, issue 2 (1999): 121–138.

MAURANEN 1993: MAURANEN, A. Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1993.

NOVAKOVIĆ & SUDIMAC 2017: NOVAKOVIĆ, A. & SUDIMAC, N. “Diskursne funkcije zamenica ja i mi u akademskim člancima srbista i anglista.” Nasleđe, vol. 14, issue 38 (2017): 81-94. [orig.] Новаковић, A. & Судимац, Н. “Дискурсне функције заменица ја и ми у академским чланцима србиста и англиста.” Наслеђе, бр. 14, издање 38 (2017): 81-94.

SWALES 1990: SWALES, J. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

TANG & JOHN 1999: TANG, R., JOHN, S. “The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through frst person pronoun.” English for Specifc Purposes, vol. 18, issue S1 (1999): 23–39.

TOŠOVIĆ 2002: TOŠOVIĆ, Branko. Funkcionalni stilovi. Beograd: Beogradska knjiga, 2002. [orig.] ТОШОВИЋ, Бранко. Функционални стилови. Београд: Београдска књига, 2002.

VANDE KOPPLE 1985: VANDE KOPPLE, W. J. “Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse.” College Composition and Com¬munication, vol. 36 (1985): 82–93.

VASIĆ 2000: VASIĆ, Vera. Autorizacija iskaza kao izraz subjektivnog stave u srpskoj gramatici Buka St. Karadžića. Zbornik matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku XLIII (2000): 91–97 [orig.] ВАСИЋ, Вера. Ауторизација исказа као израз субјективног става у српској граматици Вука Ст. Караџића. Зборник Матице српске за филологију и лингвистику XLIII (2000): 91–97.

VASSILEVA 1998: VASSILEVA, I. “Who am I / who are we in academic writing?” International Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 8, issue 2 (1998): 163−190.

VASSILEVA 2000: VASSILEVA, I. Who is the author? (A contrastive analysis of authorial presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian academic discourse). Sankt Augustin: Asgard Verlag, 2000.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-10

Issue

Section

ИСТРАЖИВАЊА / RESEARCH